A single host losing one claim is annoying. A 20-property portfolio losing three claims a month is a P&L line item. Checkout Shield is built for the operational reality of running rentals at scale, with the evidence standard that recovers every claim worth filing.
Free plan for evaluation. Business plan starts at the 5-property tier.
A single host inspects their own property, files their own claims, and absorbs the consequences of a denied claim personally. A property manager coordinates inspections across multiple cleaners, files claims on behalf of multiple owners, and explains outcomes to people who were not on site. The information chain is longer, the accountability surface is wider, and the failure modes are different.
Workflows built for single hosts do not survive contact with a multi-property operation. A phone folder of photos works for one property; for twenty properties it becomes a record-keeping disaster. A handwritten checklist works for one cleaner; for a team of four it produces inconsistent records that fail in disputes. Tools that scale linearly with property count are not tools at scale.
The operational requirement is structural: every inspection must produce the same format, regardless of who performed it. Every record must be attributable to a specific person and property. Every owner must be able to verify a report independently. Every claim must be filable without manual reconstruction of evidence from disparate sources. These are infrastructure properties, not features.
The problemMultiple cleaners produce inconsistent inspection records. When a damage claim appears, no one can tell whether the guest or the cleaner caused it.
What Checkout Shield doesPer-user identity on every report, cleaner SOP built into the workflow, post-stay inspection completed before any cleaner enters.
The problemPhotos scattered across phones, cloud storage, and email threads. Each claim requires manual reconstruction. The 14-day window expires while you search.
What Checkout Shield doesEvery photo on the same server with the same metadata standard, indexed by property and reservation, accessible in seconds.
The problemOwners ask for proof their property is being maintained. You produce screenshots and explanations, which raise more questions than they answer.
What Checkout Shield doesPublic verification URLs the owner opens directly. Independent proof requires no trust in your operation. Owner conversations get shorter.
Cleaners, co-hosts, and assistants on one account. Per-property assignments, per-user identity on every report, instant access revocation when staff changes.
Every property visible in one view. Filter by status, last inspection date, recent claims, or cleaner. Drill down to per-property history in one click.
Pre-stay and post-stay inspections stored as linked pairs. The reviewer sees before-and-after for every reservation without manual matching.
Per-property or per-period exports in PDF or shareable URL format. Monthly owner reporting takes minutes. Historical records remain permanently available.
Server-recorded GPS and timestamps. Original files hashed at capture. Any later edit produces a detectable mismatch. Evidence integrity is structural, not promised.
Every report has a URL anyone can open without an account. Airbnb, owners, insurers, small claims courts all see the same evidence with the same verification standard.
The hardest conversation in property management is the one where an owner accuses your team of causing damage that a guest caused, or where an owner blames you for missing damage that the cleaner caused. These conversations resolve poorly because the evidence is opinion, not record.
Paired inspections shift the conversation entirely. The owner gets the same verification URL the platform sees. They open it themselves, verify the pre-stay and post-stay records, and see exactly what state the property was in at each transition. The argument moves from “trust us” to “verify it yourself,” which is a much shorter argument.
Owners do not need to trust the property manager. They need to verify the property manager. Independent verification is the operational currency of the relationship.
The compounding benefit appears over months. Owners with access to verified inspection records stop questioning operational decisions, stop second-guessing cleaner work, and stop disputing damage attribution. The evidence does the talking, and the property manager spends less time defending and more time managing.
Pricing scales with property count, not user count. Unlimited team members on every plan. The cost per property declines as the portfolio grows.
Up to 1 property
Single host setup, full inspection workflow
5 to 50 properties
Team access, bulk export, multi-property dashboard
50+ properties
Dedicated support, custom SLAs, white-label options
Direct answers to the operational questions that matter at scale.
Each cleaner gets their own access to the team account. They run pre-stay and post-stay inspections through the same workflow, on any device. Reports stay attached to the property, not the user. When you review a property's history, you see every inspection across every cleaner in one place. Cleaner identity is recorded on each report, so accountability is automatic.
Yes. Team members can be assigned to specific properties or given access to the full portfolio. Permissions are per-property, so a cleaner who only handles one building does not see reports for properties they do not manage. Co-hosts and assistant managers can be given broader access for oversight.
The post-stay inspection completed before the cleaner enters establishes the boundary. Anything captured at that moment is attributable to the guest. Anything that appears later is the cleaner's responsibility. The timestamp and integrity hash make this boundary verifiable to the owner without requiring them to trust your operation.
Yes. Each inspection produces a public verification URL that can be shared with owners directly. Owners see the same evidence Airbnb sees, with the same verification standard. This shifts the owner conversation from "trust us" to "verify it yourself," which usually resolves disputes faster.
Yes. The inspection workflow is platform-agnostic. The same report format works for Airbnb AirCover claims, Vrbo damage disputes, Booking.com partner support cases, and small claims court filings. One inspection serves all platforms; there is no per-platform tooling overhead.
Pricing scales with the number of properties under management, not the number of users or inspections. Business plans include team access, multi-property dashboards, bulk export, and dedicated support. The cost per property declines as the portfolio grows. Full pricing details are on the pricing page.
Yes. The dashboard supports per-property or per-period exports, in PDF or shareable URL format. Monthly owner reports take minutes, not hours. Records remain in the system permanently, so historical exports are always available for retrospective disputes or audits.
The cleaner's account access is revoked from the team, and all historical reports they completed remain attached to the properties. Future inspections by a new cleaner continue from where the previous one left off. Cleaner turnover does not produce evidence gaps, which is a common failure mode in spreadsheet-based systems.
Adding properties takes about 30 seconds each. The full setup for a 20-property portfolio, including cleaner accounts and assignments, runs about 1 to 2 hours. The first round of pre-stay inspections happens during the next normal turnover cycle. There is no separate rollout phase.
Yes. Business plan customers get a structured onboarding session covering team setup, cleaner SOP integration, owner reporting workflow, and dispute escalation procedures. Most teams are fully operational within a week of signup, often within the first few days.
Free trial. No credit card. Add your first five properties, invite your team, run one full turnover cycle, and see the workflow before any payment decision.
Most operations are fully running within a week of signup.