Behind the review

A person decides your claim.
Here is what they look at.

Escalate a damage claim and an Airbnb case manager rules on it. This guide takes you inside that review: what happens after you file, the factors the reviewer weighs, and how to make ruling in your favour the easy choice.

By Checkout ShieldLast updated 2026-07-068 min read
Quick answer

When a guest will not pay and you escalate, an Airbnb case manager reviews the claim under AirCover for Hosts. They weigh five things: the quality and dating of your evidence, whether you can prove the item was intact before the stay, whether you filed in time, whether the amount is specific and supported, and the on-platform messages. It is a human, evidence-led decision, so the goal is to make the correct ruling the obvious one.

How the review works, in four facts

Case manager

A person reviews the escalated claim

Evidence-led

The decision follows the documentation

Timeline

When you captured and filed matters

Both sides

Your messages and the guest response count

What happens after you file

A claim starts in the Resolution Center, where you request reimbursement from the guest. If they pay, it ends there. If they decline or go quiet, you escalate, and that is when a case manager enters the picture. From that point the decision is out of the guest's hands and into a reviewer's.

Understanding this hand-off matters, because it changes who you are really writing for. The reimbursement request is aimed at the guest; the escalated claim is aimed at a reviewer who was not there and knows only what you show them. The whole damage policy is built around that reality.

What the reviewer weighs

A case manager is not looking for reasons to deny you; they are looking for enough to justify a payout to their own process. These are the factors that give them that justification.

FactorWhat strengthens it
Evidence qualityOriginal, dated, verifiable photos of the damage captured in place
Baseline conditionA dated check-in record proving the item was intact before the stay
TimelineDamage captured at checkout and filed inside the window
Claimed amountA specific figure backed by repair quotes or receipts, not a round guess
CommunicationA clear, on-platform reimbursement request and the guest response

The standard behind the first two rows is defined in the evidence guide, and the amount in the fourth is worked out with the Cost Estimator.

Why claims come back partial

A partial payout is the reviewer meeting you halfway: they could support some of the claim but not all of it. It usually traces to one of three things, depreciation on an older item, an amount that was not fully evidenced, or damage that partly read as wear.

Every gap in your evidence becomes the reviewer's discretion. Fill the gaps and there is nothing left to interpret; leave them and the decision drifts toward the conservative number.

If a decision comes back lower than it should, or denied outright, there is a path to challenge it, covered in the claim appeals guide.

This is what Checkout Shield does

Make the reviewer's decision the easy one.

A case manager rules on what they can verify. Checkout Shield hands them exactly that: dated, GPS-verified, tamper-evident proof of condition before and after the stay, with a public link they can check without an account.

  • Paired check-in and checkout inspections per booking
  • Server-verified GPS and timestamps at capture
  • Tamper-evident hash on every original photo
  • Answers every factor a case manager weighs
  • Public verification link, no login required
  • Free plan for one property

Score your AirCover claim before you submit

Your claim has hidden weaknesses. We will show you exactly what is missing from your evidence and how to fix it in the remaining filing window. Free. Two minutes.

Score My Claim, Free

What the reviewer cannot see

The most useful thing to understand about a reviewer is how little they actually have to work with. They were not at your property. They did not see the damage happen. They cannot tell an honest host from a dishonest one by instinct. All they have is what you submit and what the guest submits, weighed against the platform's rules.

That changes how you should think about a claim. The burden is on you to close every gap the reviewer would otherwise have to resolve against you, because an unanswered question, was this pre-existing? was this the guest? was this wear and tear?, is resolved conservatively. A claim is not a story you tell; it is a set of questions you pre-answer with evidence, so the reviewer never has to guess.

How to write the claim a reviewer approves

Given how a reviewer works, the way you write the claim matters almost as much as the evidence behind it. The claims that move fastest read like an incident report, not a complaint:

  • Itemise. One line per damaged item, each with its own description, cost, and attached evidence, rather than a single lump sum.
  • Be specific. "Dining chair, cracked rear leg, replacement quoted at $180" beats "broken furniture" every time.
  • Stay factual. Emotional or angry language slows a claim down; a calm, evidenced account speeds it up.
  • Lead with the strongest proof, such as a verification link to dated, GPS-tagged records the reviewer can open directly.

The full denial-and-approval patterns behind this are mapped in the damage claim guide, and you can pressure-test a claim first with the Claim Strength Checker.

Keep going

FAQ

Got a question? Here are the answers.

The questions hosts ask about the claim review, answered plainly.

01

Who decides an Airbnb damage claim?

When a guest does not pay your reimbursement request and you escalate, an Airbnb case manager reviews the claim under AirCover for Hosts. They assess the evidence, the timeline, the amount, and the communication between you and the guest, then decide what to pay. It is a human review guided by documentation, not an automatic calculation.

02

What does an Airbnb case manager look at?

The strength and dating of your evidence, whether you can show the item was intact before the stay, whether you filed within the window, whether the amount is specific and supported, and the on-platform message history. The clearer and more verifiable each of these is, the easier it is to rule in your favour.

03

Why did Airbnb only pay part of my claim?

Partial payouts usually mean the reviewer could support some of the claim but not all of it, because of depreciation, an amount that was not fully evidenced, or damage that partly read as wear and tear. A specific, documented figure for each item reduces the room for a conservative decision.

04

How long does an Airbnb claim decision take?

It varies with the complexity of the claim and how much back-and-forth is needed. A clean claim with complete, verifiable evidence and a clear amount is faster to decide than one that prompts follow-up questions. Giving the reviewer everything up front is the best way to speed it up.

05

Can I influence the decision?

You cannot argue the reviewer into a payout, but you can make the correct decision the obvious one. Complete, dated, verifiable evidence, a supported amount, and a clean timeline leave little to interpret. Weak or missing pieces are what create room for a denial or a reduction.

Shape what we build next

Help us to improve

Was this guide helpful? Rate it and tell us what to build next. We read every single response.

Tap a star to rate
Before a case manager sees it...

See your claim the way the reviewer will.

The free Claim Strength Checker scores your evidence against the factors a case manager weighs, and shows the gaps that invite a denial or a reduction.

Free plan, no credit card. Ready in 2 minutes.