For most hosts the honest answer is no, not for hosting activity. This guide explains why standard policies exclude short-term rentals, what STR insurance and AirCover each cover, and the evidence that decides whether any of them pays.
A homeowners policy is priced and written for one assumption: the home is your personal residence. The moment you accept paying guests, the insurer sees commercial use, and commercial use is a standard exclusion. The risk profile changes, strangers occupy the space, and the policy you bought was never rated for that.
This matters most at claim time. An insurer reviewing a guest-related loss can deny it by pointing to the business-use exclusion, even if the same damage from a personal guest would have been covered. The exclusion is not a technicality they sometimes invoke. It is the default outcome for undisclosed hosting.
Some insurers offer a home-sharing endorsement that extends limited coverage to occasional rental activity. It is worth asking, but read the limits closely, because these endorsements are usually narrow and capped well below the value of a serious incident.
A regulated policy built for hosting. It contemplates paying guests, guest-caused damage, liability from injuries, and often lost rental income. It has a contract and an appeals process, which AirCover does not.
Airbnb's built-in program for guest-caused property damage and certain liability. Useful and free, but discretionary, narrower than a real policy, and dependent on evidence. It supplements insurance, it does not replace it.
The layer that makes the other two pay. A timestamped, GPS-verified record of property condition before and after each stay is what proves a guest caused the damage during their booking.
Hosts who assume their homeowners policy has them covered tend to discover the gap during their first real loss. By then it is too late to backdate coverage or capture the evidence.
The instinct to stay quiet about hosting is understandable and dangerous. An insurer that learns about undisclosed short-term rental activity can treat it as a material misrepresentation, which is grounds to deny a claim or cancel the policy. The thing you hoped would protect you becomes void at the worst possible moment.
Disclose that you host. Ask whether they offer a home-sharing endorsement, what it covers, and what it caps. If the answer is thin, which it often is, move the property to a dedicated short-term rental policy. The cost of doing this is small next to the cost of a denied total loss.
AirCover is genuinely useful for the everyday case: a guest breaks something, you have evidence, you recover the cost. It also includes liability protection for guest injuries up to a stated limit. For many hosts it handles the routine incidents without an insurance claim at all.
Its limits show up at the edges. It is discretionary, so a weak claim is denied with no external appeal. It excludes many scenarios a real policy covers, and it does nothing for lost income while the property is unbookable. Treating AirCover as your only safety net leaves the expensive, unusual losses uncovered.
For a direct comparison, see AirCover vs host insurance and the short-term rental insurance guide.
Coverage is only potential money. It becomes real money when you can prove the loss. Every path, an STR policy, AirCover, or a direct Resolution Center charge, asks the same question: can you show the damage occurred during this guest stay and was not there before.
That is a documentation problem, not an insurance problem. A clean check-in baseline and a matching check-out record answer it directly, which is why the hosts who recover consistently are the ones who document every turnover, not the ones with the thickest policy.
Put a number on your current exposure with the risk calculator before your next booking, not after your next loss.
Checkout Shield generates GPS-verified, timestamped inspection reports at every check-in and check-out. It produces the before-and-after evidence that AirCover, your STR policy, and the Resolution Center all need before they pay.
The most common questions about insurance and Airbnb hosting, with direct answers.
Usually not. Standard homeowners policies are written for personal residential use and exclude commercial activity, which is how insurers classify short-term rental income. A guest-related loss can be denied on the grounds that the home was being used as a business when the damage occurred.
They can. Some insurers treat undisclosed short-term rental activity as a material change that voids or non-renews the policy. The safer path is to tell your insurer you host and either add an endorsement or move to a dedicated short-term rental policy.
Homeowners insurance covers you as a resident. Short-term rental insurance is built for hosting: it contemplates paying guests, guest-caused damage, liability from guest injuries, and often lost rental income. It is a regulated policy with a contract and an appeals process, unlike AirCover.
No. AirCover is a discretionary Airbnb program, not a regulated policy. It pays for some guest-caused damage when evidence is sufficient, but it does not cover many events a real policy does, and there is no external appeal if it declines. Most professional hosts carry STR insurance in addition to AirCover.
Yes. Whether you claim through AirCover, an STR policy, or the Resolution Center, the payout depends on proving the damage happened during a specific guest stay. A timestamped before-and-after record is what turns any coverage into an actual payment.
A dedicated short-term rental policy as the foundation, AirCover as a built-in supplement for guest-caused damage, and a verifiable inspection workflow that produces the evidence every one of those layers needs to pay.
Disclose your hosting, get the right coverage, and build the evidence layer that makes any policy pay. The risk calculator shows what you are exposed to today.
Free plan, no credit card. Ready in 2 minutes.